WWE world WWE Opinions: Roman Reigns

Roman Reigns lost the WWE Championship to Seth Rollins at Money in the Bank on June 19, 2016. The next night on Raw he came out lashing out at fans and somehow managed to weasel his way into a triple treat match for the WWE Championship against Dean Ambrose and Seth Rollins at WWE Battleground. The next morning on June 21, 2016 WWE announced that they have suspended none other than the former WWE Champion Roman Reigns for his violation of the WWE wellness policy.

Roman Reigns vs Seth Rollins for the WWE Championship at WWE Money in the Bank 2016

The problem with this whole situation is the fact that WWE knew of the violation before Money in the Bank and before Monday Night Raw. Why did they wait before suspending him? Any other WWE superstar would have been gone as soon as they found out about the violation. I understand he was the WWE champion, but why not suspend him immediately after Money in the Bank? I know everyone is excited for this former Shield member match as am I. WWE should have never had Roman Reigns on Raw the next night. They should've set up Dean Ambrose vs Seth Rollins for the title and then save the triple threat for Summerslam. This match is HUGE. So why not save it for Summerslam?

Roman Reigns

Roman Reigns being suspended basically leaves us with a build-up to Dean vs Seth for the title at Battleground, but then Roman will just show up in the match. This is terrible timing on WWE's hands.

Do you agree? How do you think WWE should've handled the situation? Drop a comments in the comments section below!